Is Dilution the Solution?
Scientists study how biodiversity affects the spread of animal-borne disease.
Lynne Peeples • June 4, 2009
American robins are one of many wildlife species that can thrive in developed areas near humans, and spread diseases to them. [Credit: Colin Purrington, flickr.com] Below left, Researchers survey scat to estimate the local population of deer. [Credit: Lynne Peeples]
Shannon Duerr counts excrement. She kneels on the forest floor and, between picking hungry ticks off her arm, carefully tallies a pile of at least ten pellets she has collected. Since more than half of the pellets fall inside a hundred-square-foot circle she has encompassed with a short metal pole and a long piece of string, Duerr estimates that at least one white-tailed deer has passed through here since the winter’s first freeze.
This part of upstate New York, Dutchess County, has one of the highest rates of Lyme disease in the country. Duerr is part of a research team that is trying to understand why the region is such a hotbed for the disease, which is carried by animals and can sicken humans. Clad in white suits smeared with deer feces, she and other scientists from the Cary Institute for Ecosystem Studies in nearby Millbrook, New York are busy calculating the local deer population as a prelude for conducting an unusual experiment. The researchers want to know whether the incidence of Lyme disease will change if the composition of critters in a community changes, and if the presence of certain species might “dilute” the concentration of the virus. To that end, they will trap mice, chipmunks and gray squirrels and redistribute them between small patches of forest they have zoned for the study. And then they will watch to see what happens.
“We’re shaking up the densities of Lyme disease players,” says Duerr, a senior research specialist at the Cary Institute. Of course, moving around white-tailed deer is a far more formidable challenge than collecting and transplanting white-footed mice. So instead of altering deer populations in forest tracts, the researchers rely on feces counts to estimate their numbers. These will be included in later mathematical models along with data from the redistributed animals.
Familiar faces in urban spaces
Both mice and deer belong to a growing lineup of recognized carriers of infectious disease. Hidden behind fur coats or colorful feathers, they may look innocent, yet some of these hardy co-habitants of urban and suburban landscapes — American robins, blue jays, chipmunks, shrews and many others — are spreading diseases that can be lethal to humans.
The small islands of green in our backyards and parks are stripped-down ecosystems harboring relatively few species compared to the rich variety of animals and plants in larger swaths of open land. Since scientists have found that humans are more likely to get West Nile virus or Lyme disease if they live in areas where biodiversity is low, Duerr and her colleagues want to learn which of these resilient animals — and in what combinations — have the greatest effect on disease, and in which spaces they are found. The answers could affect future land-use decisions and prompt new strategies to lower rates of infection.
Hardy species “have something in common that makes them both more resilient to human-disturbance and more permissive to pathogens,” says Rick Ostfeld, a senior scientist at the Cary Institute who is leading this summer’s field experiment in Dutchess County. “As you chop up the woods, pave things over, and put in strip malls, a lot of wildlife species will disappear. But a few, like mice, don’t.”
Why the same species we find close to our homes and cities also tend to be the most prone to passing on pathogens intrigues Ostfeld. And his current research could help explain this part of the mysterious relationship between biodiversity and disease. He thinks that certain short-lived animals like chipmunks and mice may have evolved a “live fast, die young” lifestyle that predisposes them to be less affected by habitat destruction, and more sensitive to bacteria and viruses.
“If you are going to die from predation before you ever die from infectious disease,” says Ostfeld, “then you might allocate your limited energy to higher reproductive rates and predator avoidance rather than an energetically expensive adaptive immune response.” That may be why these rapidly reproducing species have evolved into pathogen-promoting machines.
Other disease experts recognize the same patterns. “Most West Nile competent hosts thrive in human-disturbed environments,” says Brian Allan, who studies the ecology of the West Nile virus at Washington University in St. Louis. “You’re much more likely to go into Central Park and see a large number of American robins [which carry the virus] than if you went into the Catskills.”
West Nile and Lyme are zoonotic diseases, meaning they emerge from non-human wildlife populations to infect people. In the case of West Nile, a mosquito acts as the viral messenger between animal and human. If a mosquito carrying the virus bites a bird — like the American robin — that is able to develop a substantial viral load in its blood, then the next mosquito to feast on that bird may acquire the pathogen. The more of these virulent pests there are flying around, the more likely one will bite a human and transmit the zoonotic pathogen. The number of humans infected has fluctuated across the country since West Nile arrived in New York State in 1999. According to the Centers for Disease Control, there were on average over 4,500 cases and 160 deaths per year in the United States since 2002.
A similar process of transmission holds true for the more common Lyme disease, with 26,739 confirmed U.S. cases in 2008. (Although Ostfeld thinks both Lyme and West Nile numbers may be significant undercounts due to budget cuts at county health departments, which are the source of the CDC’s data.) Since the first cases were recognized in the mid-1970s in Lyme, Connecticut, deer ticks have been implicated as the wildlife-to-human smugglers.
When a mosquito or tick feeds on an animal that can’t transmit the infectious agent, however, the pathogen hits a dead end. If a significant number of these weak hosts are present, then fewer mosquitoes and ticks will be carrying the pathogens, and the risk of humans contracting the disease diminishes. This watering-down of disease was coined the “dilution effect” by Ostfeld in a 2000 paper.
Awesome article. I actually think the dilution effect would work. This makes sense. I was bitten in my backyard and have been sick with Lyme for 13 years now. The problem with healthcare is an entirely different story but this problem with Lyme effects everyone, even athletes like this runner http://www.beatlymediseae.com who apparently went hiking and was bitten and remained sick for 4 years until she finally recovered from it. Once people are bitten it’s so hard to get over these nasty pathogens. Thanks so much for the article.
Ops, I was writing too fast and didn’t put the her website right. it’s http://www.beatlymedisease.com
also there are good wikipedia information online about what to do about Lyme Disease.
Again, thank you for the article and the research!
A good web page that has a interactive map that tracks Tick- Borne vectors is…. http://WWW.DOGSANDTICKS.COM. It tracks by State and County.Our Four leg family members have ticks that often love to bite the owner.One bite could change both your pets life and yours.I look forward to the results of this research.
Ostfeld has a long history of “science” that keeps trying to get the focus off the deer as carriers of the ticks. For people who don’t want the deer seen as the problem, Ostfeld is the answer.
Deer are the primary reason why there are so many black-legged ticks (a/k/a deer ticks), but deer don’t carry the disease itself. Therefore, Ostfeld “studies” the role of the white-footed mouse and other small creatures, since they do in fact serve as Lyme reservoirs. He ignores plenty of evidence that if you reduce the deer population to the appropriate threshold (10-15 per square mile), you get the tick population down dramatically and the Lyme disease drops with it.
No other forest animal is present in sufficient numbers and densities to serve the role of the deer in transporting huge numbers of ticks, giving the adult female her last blood meal before she drops off and lays 2,000 to 3,000 tick eggs and starts the tick life cycle all over again.
Secret hidden in plain sight: We would still have a huge deer overpopulation problem even if they were not implicated in Lyme disease. Most of our worst Lyme areas have deer densities of 60 deer per square mile or higher, four to six times what it should be if you want to reduce the disease, not to mention the forest destruction caused by the deer. (The deer destroy the habitat of other small forest creatures, songbirds, native wildflowers, etc., and leave invasive plant species as monocultures, the only things that will survive the deer overbrowsing.)
I’ve been teaching my students and colleagues for years about the importance of biodiversity in mitigating the evolution and spread of highly virulent forms of microbes. Indeed as species diversity declines, the populations of those that remain increase exponentially to take advantage of the resources and space left unfilled… if microbes are competing for resources (hosts) then natural selection should favor more virulent strains as host availability increases (e.g., burn your bridges behind you so your competition can’t follow). To make matters worse, those species that can coexist with us, are immunologically similar enough that viruses can “lock-in” on us and spread interspecifically. Perhaps biodiversity is driven by this natural checks and balance system as imposed by a rapidly changing and adaptive microbial community.
Think it such as a journal or a magazine from general interest proper to browse. Funny, witty, controversial, entertaining, useful, acerbic, thoughtful, serious, curious, unexpected comebacks are usually welcome.
, he has lost most of his teeth, and no longer eats kiblbe . This is when she told me that I shouldn’t feed him kiblbe, and I should not feed the new little one kiblbe either!This got me curious and I started doing my own research about dog food and was absolutely HORRIFIED to learn the ingredients used to make dog food. How can an entire industry (vetinarians) give such harmful advise?!?! I was and still am outraged at all the people along the way who always advised me to keep my dog on kiblbe. And I had heard it from so many sources for so many years that I figured they must be right! The day I learned what kiblbe has in it, my husband and I started cooking for our dogs. There’s been some ups and downs during the last two years, learning what to feed and what not to feed, but overall I believe that both dogs are much healthier and my husband and I definately have peace of mind knowing exactly what they are eating! Oh, and all those skin ailments and allergies that the older dog suffered from for 11 years? not a SINGLE episode in the past two years!I found this book to be very helpful in understanding what dogs need to be healthy. I learned that generally speaking, we were doing most things right. We did make some changes in the supplements based on Dr. Pitcairn’s recommendations and we replaced the white rice we had been feeding with oatmeal which both dogs seem to like. But overall, a lot of his recommendations were very similar to the advise we received from the breeder.The older dog is now 13 years old and was diagnosed with Inflammatory Brain Disease about 2 months ago. We are obviously very devastated and I believe whole-heartedly that this brain disease was brought on by the poor diet and also the top-spot flea poison he had been on all his life. I found out AFTER his diagnosis that top-spot has been linked to this disease as this is the same way the poison kills the fleas it attacks their nervous system! we had treated him with Frontline just four days before he became ill and was carried to UC Davis Vetinary Teaching Hospital.Whether you decide to buy this book or not, I strongly advise you to do your own research about your pet’s diet and decide for yourself. Some would say that cooking/preparing meals for their pets is a hassle, but this is the least you can do for all the benefits you will get from your healthier pet not to mention the money you’ll save from not taking your dog to the vet all the time to treat symptoms of a poor diet!Help other customers find the most helpful reviewsa0Was this review helpful to you?a0 | a0