A mosquito prepares to feast on a human host. [Credit: Matti Parkkonen]
A mosquito prepares to feast on a human host. [Credit: Matti Parkkonen]

ask scienceline | health | biology

If malaria can be transmitted through a mosquito’s bite, why not HIV?

- asks Injy from New York

Slap! Another mosquito! I try to resist the urge to scratch, but it would be easier to refuse a glass of water on a 110-degree day. I scratch, and oh, glorious relief! The feeling is just momentary, though, because here comes that hot sensation, and now my skin is swelling into a hideous red bump. Who knows what disease that thing could be carrying? At least I can be sure it isn’t HIV.

Scientists have pretty much ruled out the possibility that mosquitoes can spread the virus that causes AIDS. No documented case of HIV has ever been linked to the hated bloodsucker. While lack of evidence cannot by itself disprove a hypothesis, the chances of a mosquito transmitting HIV are so slim that the idea has faded out of scientific discussion as researchers face the real challenges of the immense predicament of AIDS.

However, when scientists were first learning about HIV, the insect transmission question was yet another unknown about the new disease. Some experiments and unexplained cases in the 1980s led to finger-pointing at mosquitoes, although scientists already had strong doubts that insects could transmit the disease.

In 1987, the now-defunct U.S. Office of Technology Assessment held a workshop to address concerns about a possible HIV threat from mosquitoes, bedbugs, ticks and cockroaches. Besides room for “a rare and unusual event” of possible insect transmission, the report states that it is almost impossible for the insects to pass along HIV.

The discussion has almost fizzled out, although a few investigations scattered over the years have continued to look for connections between HIV transmission and insects such as bedbugs and flies. In 2006, the United States Army Center for Health Promotion and Preventive Medicine issued a definitive report that outlined why there is no reason to worry about contracting HIV from a mosquito bite.

But why can’t you get HIV from a mosquito when it’s clearly the culprit in malaria, yellow fever and dengue fever? It’s all about the bug. There are two methods by which bloodsucking insects typically transmit disease: the biological method and the mechanical method.

The biological route is how malaria infects more than half a billion people each year. Its disease agent, the Plasmodium parasite, relies on the mosquito as a go-between to settle in human hosts.

Every mosquito bite involves a female mosquito looking for a blood meal to nourish her eggs. She injects saliva to keep the blood from clotting, and an allergic reaction to the saliva makes our skin annoyingly itchy and red after the bite. If the mama mosquito happens to bite a malaria-infected person, she ingests the parasites, which end up invading her cells and replicating. They then migrate to the salivary glands from where they can infect another human host in her next bite.

If the blood that she sucks up contains HIV, though, the virus can’t follow the same path as the malaria parasite. Instead of multiplying and eventually heading for the salivary glands, the viruses get digested, and meet their death in the insect’s gut.

The mechanical method is the other way for bloodsucking insects to pass along disease. Suppose a feeding mosquito is slapped away but is still hungry. Since insects don’t use napkins, blood remains on its mouthparts as it flies over to bite another victim. Theoretically, if Victim 1 had HIV circulating in his bloodstream, some could end up in Victim 2.

However, the probability of the transaction is almost zero. For one thing, the mosquito needs a healthy victim within quick buzzing distance of the HIV-positive one. Even in these conditions, the mosquito’s eating habits and the nature of HIV’s presence in the bloodstream still make it difficult to pick up viruses to transmit.

In a typical meal, a mosquito eats just a thousandth to a hundredth of a milliliter out of the average person’s 5.5 liters of blood. That’s like drinking a two-liter soda bottle of water out of an Olympic-sized pool.

From its tiny snack, the mosquito has hardly a chance of ingesting HIV. While the amount of the virus in blood varies from a few dozen to several hundred thousand viruses per milliliter, usually the levels are low. Blood left on the sloppy mosquito’s mouth is highly unlikely to have any HIV in it. If the mosquito bit someone with 1,000 viruses per milliliter, for example, there would be a 1 in 10 million chance of injecting just one virus body into another victim.

By now, scientists have a clear understanding of the ways HIV is spread, and insects are not one of them. With HIV’s estimated annual cost of around $20 billion and immeasurable effects on its victims, we’re lucky that the pesky mosquito’s bite isn’t another weapon in the disease’s arsenal.

Share: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • del.icio.us
  • NewsVine
Email This Email This Print This Print This

6 Comments

  1. A most interesting article, but I am still not 100% convinced. Research shows that although it is NOT completely impossible, contracting AIDS from a mosquito or any other bug is extremely unlikely. If there is even a minute chance that this could happen, wouldn’t the risk be multiplied many fold if you were working in a poorly funded AIDS hospital in the Tropics, for example? How about getting a fresh HIV infected mosquito squished in your eye, bypassing the normal transmission process research has focused on? Until I get more conclusive evidence, I will avoid warm tropical vacations and just stick to vacationing in Siberia!

  2. I’ve never understood why AIDS victims/patients aren’t quarantined from the rest of the population as was the custom in other infectuous diseases in the past. Had that been done in the very beginning there would not be an epidemic now that is out of control. Is this our way of controlling the population density on this planet by allowing sexually transmitted diseases as this and others to perpetuate for fear of offending sub-populations. It makes more sense to isolate and treat the infection and prevent the spreading than allow it to propagate unchecked because it’s a “social disease”. What is the wisdom (?) behind current treatment plans? I realize it’s too late to do that now, but why wasn’t it done back when it was first isolated by doctors and scientists in the early 1980s? Enkighten me.

  3. What a well written article! But I do agree with Patrick. I’m not 100% convinced. I did first log on here so I could read about it for some extra credit in my science class, but I ended up learning up some very neat facts! Thanks for posting. :)

  4. I agree with most of your comments. Scientists claim there have not been any reported incidents but..how many people truly go and get tested after being bitten by a mosquito for it to even be reported in the first place. They then argue that if it(transmission by mosquitoes) was the case then there would be a higher infection rate found in children..Again how many physicians even suggest HIV testing for children? Its a test that usually isnt even run unless the doc thinks the patient is /was at some risk..And finally, countries with high rates of malaria i.e Africa, tropical regions, etc also have higher rates of infection among all age groups..coincidence? you be the judge.

  5. but if u had sex with a mosquito that had HIV, would you get it then?

  6. Interesting article, beautiful word play Nathalie, but im not convinced at all.
    In the first case, she said that the HIV would get digested after the HIV infected blood was sucked by the mosquito, and the virus would supposedly die. But i would like to remind Ms. Peretsman, the author, that viruses are disputably non-living organisms, ie they could not posssibly be killed if they were never alive.
    Same goes for the second case, if the blood containing HIV stays on the mosquitoes mouth, the virus becomes dormant, not dead. Thus no matter how long it would take for the mosquitoes appettite to return, the HIV possessing blood that remained on the suckers would, all things remaining equal, reach the next meal.
    Viruses do not die in the atmosphere, they merely go to sleep.

Leave a Comment

Note: Inappropriate or offensive posts will be deleted at the discretion of the Scienceline staff.